The work lives in spreadsheets
Several people edit one Google Sheet, versions drift apart, and nobody can restore the change history.
Client portals, internal CRMs, estimate calculators, admin panels with roles. One tool instead of spreadsheets and e-mail threads.
Several people edit one Google Sheet, versions drift apart, and nobody can restore the change history.
A manager works out the estimate or the price in a calculator by following instructions. Mistakes happen, and speed depends on the person.
You have looked at several CRMs: each has 80% you do not need and lacks the 20% you do. Or it has them, but at the price of a separate project.
Order status, documents, history — all of it has to be asked from a manager, who spends half the day on it.
Part of it in the CRM, part in the accounting system, part in the mailbox. Putting the picture together is impossible.
Your tool is useful not only to you — and you are thinking about subscriptions, plans and separate accounts for clients.
Owner, manager, client, contractor — each sees their own part.
By department, branch or project.
Who changed what and when — with the option to roll back.
Where needed, for roles with access to money and personal data.
A structure built around your entities, not someone else's template.
Handle hundreds of thousands of records without slowing down.
Bringing over what currently lives in Excel and Google Sheets.
The same ones the manager uses today, only without the mistakes.
By owner, status, business line.
In your template, not a generic table.
Contracts, invoices, acts — straight from the system's data.
On the home screen, so you do not assemble the picture by hand every morning.
Telegram, e-mail, SMS — whichever suits you.
CRM, inventory, accounting.
If it is SaaS — pricing plans and recurring charges.
For a mobile app or for partners.
Not "what the system should do", but how the work is organised today: who does what, where the data comes from, where time is lost. Half of the wishes often drop out right here. 3–5 days.
A clickable scheme of screens: the logic, the transitions and the data are visible. Changing something here costs hours, not a week of rewriting code. 1–2 weeks.
We split the system into blocks, each with its own price and deadline. You see what goes into the first launch and what can wait. Delivered together with the prototype.
Every two weeks — a working block you can open and try. Priorities between stages can be changed.
We migrate the data, train the team and keep a hand on the pulse for a month. After that — development driven by your tasks.
A web app is priced by the complexity of its logic, not by the number of pages. The figures below come from our own projects.
One user role, straightforward logic, a few data types.
Several roles, your own processes, reports and exchange with existing systems.
A subscription service: many customers, plans, payments, data isolation.
The first stage — process mapping and prototype — can be ordered separately for $1200. You get a scheme of the system and an estimate you can take to any contractor, not only to us.
The "custom or ready-made" question deserves an honest answer, and the answer is more often on the side of ready-made. If your process is typical and there is a service on the market that covers it for reasonable money, building your own system will be more expensive and slower. We are the first to tell clients this.
A custom system is justified in three cases. First, the process does not fit someone else's logic: you adapt the work to the software instead of the software adapting to you. Second, the features you need exist but cost disproportionately: for one required capability you have to buy the most expensive plan for the whole team. Third, the system itself is a product you plan to sell.
The main risk in such projects is not technical — it is that the wrong system gets built. That is why we start not with code but with mapping the current process: who does what, where the data comes from, exactly where time is lost. Half of the initial wishes often drop out at this stage — it turns out a simpler solution covers the task.
Next comes a clickable prototype without design: a scheme of screens, transitions and data. Changing something in the prototype costs an hour; in written code — weeks. This is where logic errors are caught most cheaply.
Development runs in stages, each with its own price and deadline. Every two weeks you receive a part you can open and try. This removes the main fear of large projects: at any moment you can see what you paid for, and at any moment you can stop, holding a working system rather than a folder of code.
A client portal or a calculator with one role — from $6000 and 8–10 weeks. An internal system with several roles, processes and reports — from $12000, from three months. SaaS with subscriptions — from $20000. The exact estimate appears after the prototype.
Because before the process is mapped nobody — neither we nor you — knows the exact scope. A figure can be named at random, but it is either inflated "just in case" or too low, and then extra work "turns up" along the way. We name a range right away and the exact price after the prototype, when every screen is visible.
Often yes, and we will be the first to say so. A custom system is justified when your process does not fit someone else's logic, when ready-made services charge disproportionately for the features you need, or when the system itself becomes a product.
The prototype — 1–2 weeks after the start, and you can already click through it. The first working block that opens in the browser and works with real data — in 3–4 weeks. After that, the next block is added every two weeks.
Laravel on the back end, Next.js or Inertia + React on the front end, PostgreSQL or MySQL — depending on the task. Mobile apps — Flutter. We choose the stack for the project and for whoever will maintain the system afterwards.
Yes, it is a standard part of the launch. We migrate from spreadsheets, CSV exports or directly from the old system's database. Before migrating we show how the data will fit the new structure — so it does not turn out afterwards that something is missing.
For a month after launch we keep a hand on the pulse — this is included in the price. After that, either a development retainer or hourly work on request. The code, the repository and the access are yours: any developer can continue the work.
Discuss the system
Start a project